RAM Concept _Error
HiI am getting this error (please refer to the image below) while opening RAM Concept. Is there any way to remove this. I am using 6.0.1 Connect EditionThanksChirag
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
Please refer to the following wiki for a solutioncommunities.bentley.com/.../28015.design-parameters-not-being-considered-in-steel-design
View ArticleRE: P-Delta , Response Spectrum & Diaphragm in STAAD-Pro
Here are the answers to your questions 1. For a PDELTA ANALYSIS, you have to define another load case using REPEAT LOAD to combine DL+LL. Load combinations are only good for first order analysis but...
View ArticleP-Delta , Response Spectrum & Diaphragm in STAAD-Pro
Hello All, I have faced a little problem and confusion about these things (P-Delta , Response Spectrum & Diaphragm) in STAAD Pro. , I was using ETABS in the mentioned above issues and I know how it...
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
It does not work even if they are specified before" CHECK CODE ALL".
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
Please upload your model and mention the specific design parameters and member numbers you are referring to.
View ArticleRE: DOOR HINGES
Assuming the door is modeled in STAAD.pro using plates and the frame is modeled using members (beams) you will need a small separation between the beams and the plates and a node at the hing location...
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
Which Design Code you are using for the member design ? If it is IS:800-2007 code - Limit State Method of Design, then instead of using UNT, UNB and UNL, please use the LX Parameter. For the details of...
View ArticleRE: plate mesh Query in staad modelling
Loading and other parameters remaining same, depending on the meshing pattern and size the load-path changes and as a result of that element stresses, member forces, support reactions will get...
View Articleplate mesh Query in staad modelling
hello,I am designing a slab for shedding for a' machine' of steel plate supported by 4 columns on which a load is applied the loading is a solid cylinder, to apply the load it has to be generate the...
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
I'm using Canadian Code on Staad.Pro V8i(Select series 6) STAAD PLANE START JOB INFORMATION ENGINEER DATE 27-APR-16 END JOB INFORMATION INPUT WIDTH 79 UNIT METER KN JOINT COORDINATES 1 0 0 0; 2 0 3.5...
View ArticleRE: Steel Design Parameter
I looked at the code check and the parameters LY and UNL does seem to affect the code check. For example, I changed both the LY and UNL to 5 m ( just an arbitrary value ) and here is a screenshot...
View ArticleSteel Design Parameter
The following steel design parameters seem to be not recognized in the latest version STAAD. Pro V8i , they use to work great in the previous versions:LY, LZ, UNT,UNB,UNL.These command are not giving...
View ArticleRE: Limcon Bolt Strength
What type of connection are you designing? Is this for bolt tension or shear? What bolts are you using? (better yet reply back with your file and version number).
View ArticleLimcon Bolt Strength
In Limcon Bolt Strength calculation in connections seems giving higher than usual AISC 360-05 procedure. In AISC formulation is 0.75*Fn*Ab. But if you apply same in Limcon results are not consistent....
View ArticleRAM Elements Concrete Wall Design Module - ACI 318 update
I have RAM Elements 13.4.0.177, which I believe is the latest version. The concrete wall modules, both the concrete wall design and the tilt-up wall design, are still referencing ACI 318-05. Is there...
View ArticleRE: ERROR IN SOLVER
This model can be analysed with the basic solver with the following modification : memory 150STAAD SPACESTART JOB INFORMATIONENGINEER DATE 10-Sep-15END JOB INFORMATIONINPUT WIDTH 79UNIT METER KNSET...
View ArticleRE: ERROR IN SOLVER
I analysed the model using the above suggestion. Stress results and displacement i can get.1. But how can i get the buckling shapes without using the advanced solver?2. By using the above suggestion...
View ArticleRE: Limcon Bolt Strength
in my calculation 84.4 kN is 78.4 kN. Why there is difference. 0.75*520 (for A490M) * Ab (201 mm^2 for M16 bolt)
View Article