Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live

RE: Flange & web bolted splice connection

$
0
0
How to find it on the list?
Beam splice connections that I found are just flange splices or just web splices, not both at the same time.
What is the label of that type of connection?
Regards,

RE: Flange & web bolted splice connection

$
0
0
You need to assign both connections separately for the same joint. The check of web plates and flange plates will be done separately.

Warnings in Different Language

$
0
0

I've installed the English version of RAM Elements. But, whenever there are warnings after running analysis the language used for the 'warnings' is not English. How can this be corrected?

RE: Flange & web bolted splice connection

$
0
0
Overall RAM Connections is a very nice program but I think assigning the connections could be improved. It would be nice if the connections that wouldn't work with the particular joint type you are checking were greyed out. Also, even though there is a small icon next to each connection type that shows what it is, it's very hard to see. It would be nice if you could hover over a selection and see a larger image of what it is. Right now if you hover over a description it just shows the same description in a tool tip type of box which really doesn't make any sense.

Flange & web bolted splice connection

$
0
0

Dear Moderator,

I am trying to design flange & web bolted splice connection for beam continuation as per BS/AISC.

Is ii supported with those 2 standards in the STAAD - RAM connection design?

Regards,

[View:/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Beam-flange-_2600_-web-splice-connection.pdf:940:0]

RE: Beam utility for each load comb

$
0
0
This has been on my wish list for a long time. What Modestas suggest is really not very practical. Maybe now that there are two of us who would like to see this they will add this enhancement. It's been awhile since I've used SACS but if I remember right it does this so they have the technology.

RE: Beam utility for each load comb

Beam utility for each load comb

$
0
0

Dear Moderator,

Is it possible to see utility ratio of the beam for each load combination not just for the worst case?

Regards,


RE: AN ERROR IN STAAD

$
0
0
Looks like Modestas has answered your question but I have a couple of questions about your model. Do you really not want joint 6 to be supported in the Y direction? Do you really want member 6 to not carry shear in either direction at its start? (Not really a big deal because it wouldn't carry much anyway with the loads you have but I find it hard to believe you're going to slot the connection so it won't transfer any vertical shear.)

Lastly, I'm just curious why you use the Assign command for the member properties. I've never really understood the utility of this command. Maybe I just don't understand it's benefit but it seems to me to be less confusing to just pick a section yourself.

AN ERROR IN STAAD

$
0
0

Hi,

Can you please tell me what does this error mean, "ERROR - NO DEFINE DIRECT DATA ENTERED. 

What do we do to not to display above error?

Thank you.

RE: error in staad

$
0
0

In your load case 3, you have specified a trapezoidal load for which the start distance is specified as -1.6m.

...

MEMBER LOAD

1 TRAP GX 12 31.8 -1.6 1.7

This value is expected to be a positive number and is the distance measured from the start node of the member at which the load is expected to begin. I changed the value to 1.6 and the results matched at both locations as shown next.

You do have such other instances in your model too that needs to be corrected.

error in staad

RE: TIE BEAM DESIGN

$
0
0
I am assuming that you have these tie beams connecting two strap footings at the two ends and you would like to get these strap footings designed. When you take the STAAD.Pro model into STAAD Foundation Advanced ( SFA) ensure that you choose the Use Selected Supports Only and choose only those support nodes where you need the actual strap footings. If you select Use All Supports all the nodes of the grade beam, where you defined your soil springs, would also get into SFA leading to the situation you mentioned and you do not need that. Your tie beam is already designed in STAAD.Pro. You only need to get the strap footings at the two ends designed.

TIE BEAM DESIGN

$
0
0

Hello All,

I already design my tie beam and assigned multiple segments and define spring supports simulating soil at the segment nodes.
When I export this file to staad foundation it shows a strap footing with number of nodes.
My staad pro design shows the dimension of this tie beam as 400x200mm with 2-12# bar top and bottom. 
My question is should I design only the footing at both ends of this tie beam? Is my structure safe already?

Thanks in advance

RE: RAM Elements - Plastic Hinge and RBS Parameters

$
0
0

These tools are only applicable to RAM Connection. You can enter the design values in RAM Elements; however, they will be utilized in RAM Connection. Below provides more information on these tools:


RAM Elements - Plastic Hinge and RBS Parameters

$
0
0

In steel design spreadsheet under Members tab, there are two tools for seismic design namely the 'Plastic Hinge' and 'RBS parameters. However, I couldn't find any topic about the two in the help menu of RAM Elements. Please provide a link for the discussion on how to use of these two useful tools.

Truss member of STAAD and the instability problems

$
0
0

Hello everyone,

I am modeling a steel frame stand for holding a heavy steam casing. This stand will be used inside a factory, therefore only dead load and seismic load are analyzed. The profile of the stand and its post design are shown below: the pinned connections for the cross bracings only have one row and are not designed to transfer moments. 

I had some difficulties with the long cross bracing members retaining the shape of the stand in the longitudinal direction. The two cross bracings are connected to the posts of the stand by non-slip critical bolted connected. Therefore, they are not intended to take any moments and the moments at these connections are released. Since the bracings are longer, their mid-points were pinned together so that their slenderness ratio are within the acceptable range. 

We modeled the two long bracings as continuous members with a pin in the mid points. But our client wanted us to release the moments in the pin connection because the pin is not a rigid type of connections that could transfer moments. I tried to set them as truss members and it ended up with huge displacements in the mid points.

My question is:

1. What type of connection should I use for the pin at their mid points? Should I combine the two mid points or use separate mid points and then compare their displacements? Why there are huge displacements if I used "TRUSS" member?

2. What are the differences between TRUSS members and the beam members with X-, Y-, and Z- directions released? For this analysis, both the long cross bracings and short cross bracings are connected to the posts by non-slip critical connections. So they are not taking the moments. Which type of elements should I use?

I am attaching the codes from STAAD below. If our STAAD expert could have a look at it, I will really appreciate. Thanks a lot, :)

Fiona

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 03-Apr-17
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 0.3683 0; 3 0 0.6477 0; 4 0 0.8001 0; 5 0 2.2479 0; 6 0 3.3782 0;
7 0.229108 0 2.04457; 8 0.229108 0.3683 2.04457; 9 0.229108 0.6477 2.04457;
10 0.229108 2.2479 2.04457; 11 0.229108 3.3782 2.04457;
12 2.48054 3.3782 1.05979; 13 2.59715 1.4478 2.04457;
14 2.59715 1.4478 2.04457; 15 4.96519 0 2.04457; 16 4.96519 0.3683 2.04457;
17 4.96519 0.6477 2.04457; 18 4.96519 2.2479 2.04457;
19 4.96519 3.3782 2.04457; 20 5.1943 0 0; 21 5.1943 0.3683 0;
22 5.1943 0.6477 0; 23 5.1943 0.8001 0; 24 5.1943 2.2479 0; 25 5.1943 3.3782 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 4 4 5; 5 5 6; 6 2 8; 7 5 9; 8 10 3; 9 7 8; 10 8 9;
11 9 10; 12 10 11; 13 12 6; 14 12 11; 15 13 9; 16 10 14; 17 16 8; 18 4 23;
19 12 19; 20 14 17; 21 18 13; 22 12 25; 23 15 16; 24 16 17; 25 17 18; 26 18 19;
27 21 16; 28 17 24; 29 22 18; 30 20 21; 31 21 22; 32 22 23; 33 23 24; 34 24 25;
START USER TABLE
TABLE 1
UNIT INCHES KIP
TUBE
STRAIGHTBRACING
7.6875 8 3 0.375 56.5479 11.1182 29.314 6 2.25
END
UNIT INCHES KN
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 132258
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 0.00125885
ALPHA 1.2e-005
DAMP 0.03
TYPE STEEL
STRENGTH FY 163.355 FU 263.096 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 14011.9
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 0.000386106
ALPHA 1e-005
DAMP 0.05
TYPE CONCRETE
STRENGTH FCU 17.7929
ISOTROPIC RIGID_STEEL
E 1.32258e+010
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 1.25885e-006
ALPHA 1.2e-005
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 TO 5 9 TO 12 23 TO 26 30 TO 34 TABLE ST PIPE OD 8.625 ID 7.625
UNIT INCHES KIP
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
6 TO 8 27 TO 29 TABLE ST C5X9
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
18 UPTABLE 1 STRAIGHTBRACING
17 TABLE ST W4X13
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
13 14 19 22 PRIS YD 2.5
15 16 20 21 TABLE ST C6X8
UNIT INCHES KN
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL STEEL MEMB 1 TO 12 15 TO 18 20 21 23 TO 34
MATERIAL RIGID_STEEL MEMB 13 14 19 22
UNIT INCHES KIP
SUPPORTS
1 7 PINNED
15 20 FIXED BUT FX FZ MX MY MZ
UNIT INCHES POUND
MEMBER OFFSET
7 START 0 0 4.3125
28 END 0 0 4.3125
8 START 0 0 -4.3125
29 END 0 0 -4.3125
21 START -4.3125 0 0
16 START 4.3125 0 0
7 END 0 0 -4.3125
28 START 0 0 -4.3125
8 END 0 0 4.3125
20 END -4.3125 0 0
18 START 4.3125 0 0
18 END -4.3125 0 0
17 START -4.3125 0 0
15 17 END 4.3125 0 0
29 START 0 0 4.3125
6 27 START 0 0 4.3125
6 27 END 0 0 -4.3125
16 END 0 0 0
20 START 0 0 0
UNIT INCHES KIP
MEMBER RELEASE
6 TO 8 17 27 TO 29 START MX MY MZ
6 TO 8 17 27 TO 29 END MX MY MZ
13 14 19 22 END MX MY MZ
UNIT MMS NEWTON
MEMBER TRUSS
15 16 20 21
UNIT INCHES POUND
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE None  TITLE WEIGHT OF STEAM CASING
UNIT INCHES KIP
SELFWEIGHT Y -1.41
JOINT LOAD
12 FY -60.7
UNIT MMS NEWTON
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE None  TITLE SEISMIC LOAD
SELFWEIGHT X -0.21
JOINT LOAD
12 FX -56714.8
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None  TITLE 1.4 X DEAD LOAD
REPEAT LOAD
1 1.4
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE None  TITLE 1.0 X DEAD LOAD + 1.0 X SEISMIC LOAD
REPEAT LOAD
1 1.0 2 1.0
UNIT INCHES KIP
PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
CHANGE
PARAMETER 1
CODE CANADIAN
FYLD 50 MEMB 1 TO 5 9 TO 12 18 23 TO 26 30 TO 34
UNIT MMS NEWTON
PARAMETER 4
CODE CANADIAN
FU 364.754 MEMB 1 TO 8 11 TO 32 34
PARAMETER 5
CODE CANADIAN
FYLD 248.211 MEMB 6 TO 8 15 TO 17 20 21 27 TO 29
CHECK CODE ALL
FINISH

RE: tendon out of trimmed section

$
0
0
Tendons that are out of the cross section would not be considered in the hyperstatic loading used for strength and ductility design. Ignoring the warnings could create other issues.

You could use "T or L" or "None" cross section trimming and then ignore the shear reinforcement that is designed. Otherwise, you could add a separate the full-width design strip into 2 full-width strips: one that includes the two tendons and the thickened region and a second that includes just the depressed area.

tendon out of trimmed section

$
0
0

A depression is added to a slab. It takes up most of the design strip. Due to shear reinforcing added where it shouldn't be, the design strip in the picture was trimmed with "Slab Rectangle". This eliminated the shear ties, but caused warnings that the highlighted tendons were outside of the core. What is the best way to rectify this?

I could simply ignore this warning. However, are those tendons not being included in the analysis?

RE: error message comes. "IS BADLY SHAPED, WARPED, NOT CONVEX OR NOT NUMBERED COUNTER CLOCKWISE". What can i do to solve this?

$
0
0

(Please visit the site to view this file)

Viewing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>