Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live

ERROR AT JOINT

Hello guys.I got this problem on a structure I am working on. STAAD keeps showing error on node ## Direction = Mx , My or FxI tried releasing the beams attached to the nod on the given direction but...

View Article


slotted holes in the member

dear allgood day.I have a questionthe structure which i am going to model  it has slotted holes in some members,how can i make modeling for these holes ,thanks 

View Article


CHECK RESULTS CAREFULLY, LOADS MAY HAVE BEEN LOST *** ERROR *** ABOVE COMMAND...

i have analysed a structure and have got 1 error that says check results carefully loads may have been lost. please help me. i have attached my model as...

View Article

RE: Error at Joint STAAD

I believe the same issue is discussed here: communities.bentley.com/.../128912

View Article

Error at Joint STAAD

Hello friends. I am trying to design a structure and I keep on stumbling on the same error over and over again. The analysis keeps showing Error at Joint on Direction = Mx/My/Fx/FzWhen I try to release...

View Article


RE: CHECK RESULTS CAREFULLY, LOADS MAY HAVE BEEN LOST *** ERROR *** ABOVE...

Thank you very much. this helped me a lot.

View Article

RE: High value for moment shows in result

High FY value is reported due to the temperature load (LC2). Some members in your structure are failing the strength check, not the deflection check. You can provide LY, LZ, UNT or UNB design...

View Article

RE: slotted holes in the member

I'm using STAAD PRO V8i

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: slotted holes in the member

View Article


RE: slotted holes in the member

The only way to model such beams would be modeling using plate mesh.

View Article

RE: RAM Connection Gusset Plate design issue

We got some confirmation from AISC that the initial 3" minimums refer to concrete cover and don't need to be enforced in the final checks since we are already checking that in the anchors section. We...

View Article

RE: RAM Connection Gusset Plate design issue

Cool. Thanks for following up.

View Article

RAM Connection Gusset Plate design issue

Hi I am trying to design a brace column connection with a base plate. I am using the smart gusset plate option to design in RAM connection. The frame was imported from a design that was completed in...

View Article


Staad Foundation Advanced

Can someone please check for me?I amstill new to this software.   The file ran the analysis but it did not give me the design reinforcement outputs.

View Article

SFA file

HiI uploaded the file in the Secure Advanced 

View Article


RE: Tension members in Staad

Gilbert : As of now, STAAD.Pro does not allow Tension/Compression members to be used in a DIRECT ANALYSIS. If TENSION/COMPRESSION is assigned, these attributes are turned off and the members are simply...

View Article

RE: direct analysis with tension members

1. As part of your reference load R1, you have specified a member load as shown below 177 179 181 UNI GY -13.442 3.688 For a uniformly distributed load, the two parameters you specified, indicate the...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: RAM SBeam v3.0

In the LRFD third edition, the phi factor for beam shear is 0.9 (see section F2). It's shown in the output report just in front of Vn in the Shear (ultimate) section. For flexure, Phi can be 0.9 or...

View Article

RAM SBeam v3.0

Hello -My office still uses version 3.0 of RAM SBeam. When analyzing composite beams, I notice in the output that phi factor of 0.85 and 0.9 are used for flexure and shear, respectively. RAM SBeam v3.0...

View Article

RE: Tension members in Staad

Just for future reference, a wiki is now created on the same topic atcommunities.bentley.com/.../31875.member-tensioncompression-with-direct-analysis

View Article
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>