Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live

Eurocode EN 1993-1-1:2005: code check using resultant forces

Hello, I'm looking into the code checking of a circular cross-section (class 1) using the Eurocode EN 1993-1-1:2005, and have some questions regarding how Staad.Pro does the checks: 1) For clause 6.2.6...

View Article


RE: LATERAL RESISTANCE OF JACK SYSTEM (ANALYSIS BY STAAD Pro)

I'm not sure I totally understand, but if your goal is to provide a spring support, with lateral resistance based on friction, then the process would be to assign a spring in the lateral directions...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

LATERAL RESISTANCE OF JACK SYSTEM (ANALYSIS BY STAAD Pro)

Hi,Project: Jacking of  Gantry Crane Structure for Installation of Additional Leg.Crane Selfweight = 600 TonsI end up modelling this kind of structure in STAAD Pro to determine if the whole system will...

View Article

RE: Beam to Columns connection (0.04 radian interstory drift ratio)

Ram Connection does not specifically check for a moment demand based on AISC 341-10 SE3.6b(2) which says: The measured flexural resistance of the connection, determined at the column face, shall equal...

View Article

Beam to Columns connection (0.04 radian interstory drift ratio)

I'm using RAM Frame and RAM Connection to design a SMRF...Within the RAM Frame report Seismic Provision Member Code Check there is section E3.6b outlining the requirement that the beam to column...

View Article


RE: Instability at Joint

Don't pin all your members in torsion (MX in STAAD.pro), that's just asking for a trouble as the members can spin about their own axis when connected members and/or supports are not rigid.For more on...

View Article

RE: Macro for renumbering nodes / beams / plates

Check section 5.15 Redefinition of Joint and Member Numbers of the OpenSTAAD help (C:\SProV8i SS6\STAAD\Help\OpenSTAAD.chm)SubstituteJoint and member numbers may be redefined in STAAD through the use...

View Article

RE: Conexiones con Ram Connection código de diseño EN 1993-1-8 2005

English response. Translate the page if required. AISC provides extensive documentation for the design requirements of various connections, which we follow as closely as possible in our designs. Other...

View Article


Conexiones con Ram Connection código de diseño EN 1993-1-8 2005

Buenos días,Estoy realizando el diseño de conexiones bajo el código EN 1993-EC3En una conexión sencilla a corte de viga HEB 280 al alma de columna HEB 400 he observado que aunque en la definición de...

View Article


RE: Stressed skin design using STAAD

Hi, I came across on this discussion and i'm on the same situation? Please let me know how did you analyze the stress skin using STAAD. Thank you in advance.

View Article

Stressed skin design using STAAD

Hi,Does anyone have experience using STAAD for stressed skin design principle? I have modelled the frame, plates and stiffeners with correct offsets, but I am not sure how to proceed.  Any tips &...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: Wind Load Problem

Hi, NeerajThe expose area should be a closed plane. But there is no a plane for hightlight region  in your model .I suggest you add some virtual column to generate a plane.

View Article

Wind Load Problem

Hi,When am applying the wind load,some portions are not getting affected by wind.It is the place wherever i did offset to columns...For getting the perfect structural model,i have to offset the...

View Article


RE: Instability at Joint

Thanks a lot for the quick reply. As I mentioned earlier I made sure that the nodes to which I connect all the torsion released members are rigid by connecting those nodes to other members( nodal...

View Article

RE: Instability at Joint

when loads do not have a trasfer path to the support s these instabilty notes are genereated by the stadd I went through your model. Insted of 100% releasing of the moment at the joints ,you have to...

View Article


Instability at Joint

HI,I am quite new to staad pro. Can anyone please explain me why I am getting an instability at joint 43 in MZ direction. In the model I have attached herewith I made sure that the  member 28 is...

View Article

RE: Staad.Pro v8i, design check difference with axis Z up

in staad how we change the gravity direction from y to z

View Article


corresponding effects in the result file...

I need to know the exact meaning of the " corresponding effects " for each lane in the staad beava result file.....

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: Staad.Pro v8i, design check difference with axis Z up

You can change it by select Direction "Z".

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Staad.Pro v8i, design check difference with axis Z up

I am currently experiencing trouble with the new relase of Staad.Pro (v8i).Conditions:axis Z upsteel design AISC unified, method LRFDseveral steel design in the same modelWhen i set the axis Z up,...

View Article
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>