Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: Cable Section Property

It appears that you could not access the standard cable section under AISC section database. These section are included within the AISC Section RCeco databse pack.Can you go to to CONFIGURATION->...

View Article


Cable Section Property

Introduce me Abrar as lecturer Indonesia Institute and administrator of license academic of Staad.Pro.I have problem about Cable Section property. My students write the scription about Arch Bridge and...

View Article


RE: Modeling an elevator's wall

In general, the LIFT core or the LIFT wall is designed to save both the purposes (1) the lift passage track (2) the Shear wall. Now, if yo want to design this lift core as shear-wall, then you may use...

View Article

RE: Modeling an elevator's wall

Thank you very much !

View Article

Modeling an elevator's wall

Hello Sir, I have two questions.1. What is the best element type to model and design a lift wall in STAAD.Pro per ACI 318 Code ? Surface or Plate ? 2. What is the difference in output results between a...

View Article


RE: Fundamental natural Period

If you do not provide type of structure- ST parameter, the program searches if you have manually provided the value of approx. fundamental time period of the structure from PX and PZ parameter. If you...

View Article

Fundamental natural Period

Hi there...I am making a Seismic definition as per IS 1893...I did not provide the type of structure in definition and staad calculated the value for Time period which was way too much low as per...

View Article

Staad.Pro 20.07.11.70 - customize menu

Regarding Staad.Pro 20.07.11.70.I want to hide the menu item "Bentley Cloud Services". It's on the same line as File, Edit, Windows and Help.Before I create an installer package for our users, I like...

View Article


RE: Problem in Response Spectrum Analysis by using IS 1893:1984

Missing mass: Please refer to the following wiki for missing mass correction.http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/9114...

View Article


Problem in Response Spectrum Analysis by using IS 1893:1984

When I performing RSA by using IS 1893:1984 it is not showing proper result and one note also comes.I try to figure out the problem.i figure out one prob that for 1st mode staad calculate spectural...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: asARE THESE LOAD COMBINATIONS CORRECT AS PER IS 1893 IN STAAD PRO

You can use auto-load combination for Indian Code which takes care of these combinations automatically using the following process.  

View Article

asARE THESE LOAD COMBINATIONS CORRECT AS PER IS 1893 IN STAAD PRO

Are these load combinations correct in staad pro  as per IS 1893: 1.5 (DL+LL) 1.2( DL+LL+ELX) 1.2( DL+LL+ELZ) 1.5(DL+ELX) 1.5(DL+ELZ) .9DL+1.5ELX .9DL+1.5ELZ DL- DEAD LOAD, LL-- LIVE LOAD , EL -- E/Q...

View Article

Very high axial load at he column bases.

Anybody please tell me why i am getting very high axial load (Fy) in the columns at the base, it is due to the loading or is there some other reason.STAAD SPACESTART JOB INFORMATIONENGINEER DATE...

View Article


RE: Staad.Pro 20.07.11.70 - customize menu

There is no option to do that. If you don't mind, can you please let us know why you would like to hide/disable that option ?

View Article

RE: damping ratio

For steel structures generally 2% damping is considered as standard.

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RE: asARE THESE LOAD COMBINATIONS CORRECT AS PER IS 1893 IN STAAD PRO

1.5(DL+LL) is not the Earthquake load combo. It is purely the gravity load combination. But when you are designing a structure, you need to consider all the  different load combinations as specified by...

View Article

RE: Master Slave command

Hi Sye,I have taken another look at the model you suggested and had a few queries as it relates to the Reference Load Definition (mass type reference load in this case).1. Which section in the...

View Article


RE: damping ratio

Dear sye I already put there 0.01 damping ratio and send the file to my company . Is it acceptable are not ?

View Article

RE: damping ratio

Structural response to wind is generally elastic and so I think you are fine considering 1% damping ( damping factor 0.01 ) for wind analysis.

View Article

damping ratio

yesterday i find out how to calculate natural frequency i,am still confused how we can calculate damping ratio for a steel structure which is required for wind analysis. .

View Article
Browsing all 23543 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>