Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23543

RE: Track 2 Printing Staad

$
0
0

I think you are referring to the issue with reporting TRACK 2 output for multiple members when one asks for the Steel Design Detail from within Report Setup. We acknowledge this problem in the latest version and it will be fixed soon. In the meantime you can refer to the TRACK2 output reported as part of the analysis output file ( File > View > STAAD Analysis output )

Also while taking a look at the file I had the following observations

The following text was found in the file and was commented out as there are no group definitions.

START GROUP DEFINITION

MEMBER

END GROUP DEFINITION

There were a couple of load cases for which the iterative solution failed to converge. These were cases 2 and 7 but for all practical purposes these are not your actual cases but just component cases like LL/ ice load acting by themselves. You don’t really need to do an iterative tension/compression analysis for these cases. You may either ignore the warnings and results for these cases or you may follow the process listed next.

Comment out the spring tension and compression attributes from the first support command. Add a PEFORM ANALYSIS and CHANGE command after the case 115 and then redefine the support command after that with the spring tension and compression attributes.  

*********************************************************

LOAD 115 LOADTYPE Wind  TITLE 115 ASCE 7-10 115 MPH WIND

WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 115 XR -33.3333 41.6667 YR -10 54.1667 ZR -21.6667 54.1667 OPEN

*********************************************************

PERFORM ANALYSIS

CHANGE

UNIT INCHES KIP

SUPPORTS

1011 1012 FIXED BUT FZ MX MY MZ KFX 100000 KFY 1e+006

1021 1022 FIXED BUT MX MY MZ KFX 100000 KFY 1e+006 KFZ 1e+006

136 138 1031 1032 FIXED BUT FX FZ MX MY MZ KFY 100000

SPRING TENSION

136 138 1031 1032 KFY

SPRING COMPRESSION

1011 1012 1021 1022 KFX KFY

UNIT FEET POUND

LOAD 100 LOADTYPE None  TITLE 1.0 D + 1.0 L

REPEAT LOAD

1 1.0 2 1.0

A modified file is attached for your reference. There are unreasonably high displacements for load case 2. I did not get time to take a detailed look at it. Please check if the loads are OK or not.

(Please visit the site to view this file)


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23543

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>