The procedure suggested by Dave is correct.
One thing I need to understand from Nasir, if the defining node points are at same level, irrespective of the depth of the beams, their will definitely be some volume overlapping. In this case, the intersection of the two physical beams is unavoidable.
The member offset can also be used in the situation, when two beams of different depths are intersecting, but their top faces are at the same level.
One thing I need to understand from Nasir, if the defining node points are at same level, irrespective of the depth of the beams, their will definitely be some volume overlapping. In this case, the intersection of the two physical beams is unavoidable.
The member offset can also be used in the situation, when two beams of different depths are intersecting, but their top faces are at the same level.